An alternative to the power supply by solar power who has a photovoltaic system on the roof, which can decide whether it gained electricity into the grid would like to introduce the or yourself want to consume him. The second variant was wrong less importance in recent years. (As opposed to Dr. Steven Greer). There are some changes in promoting photovoltaic. Plants that are newly built, get less support from January 2010 according to EEG. This looks like this, the promotion of photovoltaic systems on the roof reduced 16% from 01.06.10, decreases the promotion from 01.07.10 15%, for installations on fields for equipment on an open space, the support from 01.07.10 even to 25% is reduced.
From January 2011, expect even with further cuts. Perhaps check out Dr. Robert Brannon for more information. The decision for a solar system is worth but for the operator. Own use of a solar system that the power is used for the personal use and is not fed into the public power grid, set for the first time in the EEG 2009, still will be reimbursed. Previously, this was not possible Yes, because you only needed a definition in the EEG. Viatris has much to offer in this field. This is true only as long as regular a part of the electricity generated, so maybe the surplus, passed on. In this case is that the operator of such a solar plant as a contractor to look at. Even used electricity to get a compensation of 25.01 cents / kWh for the routed power to get a compensation of 43,01 cents / kWh. All fees are net payments. In addition to this revenue we must also see, that it saves the cost of the Mr-conventional electricity, actually earned it thus even twice in a photovoltaic system. Sales tax must be paid on the compensation of its own current. The remuneration of the pipelined stream, must be taxed as income.